As per this BBC documentary, the report of a United Kingdom inquiry showcased in the documentary refers to the events as a “systematic campaign of violence” which has “all the hallmarks of ethnic cleansing” and places direct responsibility on Modi. as reported.

At the same time, the supporters of incumbent Prime Minister Modi are saying that the Supreme Court of India has already given a clean chit to Modi about his role in the 2002 Gujarat riots. Hence the charges leveled in this BBC documentary against Modi have no legal meaning.

But what is surprising is that the Indian Muslims, again out of un-Islamic cowardice, is not moving the Supreme Court of India to take cognizance of this BBC documentary on the allegedly questionable role of Modi in the 2002 Gujarat riots.

The Indian Muslims and their leaders are still suffering from Un-Islamic cowardice and hence again, are not moving the Supreme Court of India as they did earlier.

Indian Muslims rather should immediately file petition in the Supreme Court of India and should mention in this petition that – “[because the credibility of the Supreme Court of India due to said so-called clean-chit (widely publicized in India media) by the Supreme Court of India to Modi has come under suspicion hence the Supreme Court of India is under legal obligation to immediately take the cognizance of the said BBC documentary in order to restore the credibility of the Supreme Court in the eyes of 1.4 billion people of India without which rule-of-law in India has no meaning especially in view of (i)- The wider Ayodhya dispute which is responsible for 2002 Gujarat riots also and in which the Supreme Court of India didn’t come out with flying colors because first it allowed judiciary to search evidence of Ram temple at disputed site and then by excavation by the ASI (Thus inciting religious emotions of Hindus)which is legally objectionable in any civil title suit and then alloedd judiciary (including itself) to give final virdict in title suit without first restoring the legally expected restoration of status-quo-ante of Babri Masjid which was demolished in presence of the observer of the Supreme Court of India itself and (ii)-plenary powers given to the Supreme Court of India under Articles 141, 142 and 144 of the Constitution of India and]”.

Suppose Indian Muslims, especially their religious leaders (who are never tired of telling the Muslims that it is Kufr in Islam to be afraid of anyone other than Allah), still doesn’t move the Supreme Court of India, as mentioned above. In that case, it will be legitimately construed that Indian Muslims, out of some global conspiracy, want to destroy secularism and rule-of-law in India.